Showing posts with label Charles Pierce. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Charles Pierce. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 07, 2009

Mannywood, Air McNair and the death of manufactured outrage

You live in a moral grey zone. You don't exit it when you are in sports fan mode.

That is the ketchup answer — covers everything — for whatever has been said in the past week about Manny Ramírez and the late Steve McNair. Some sportswriters based in the cities where Manny has hung his do-rag, Boston and Los Angeles, were apoplectic that Ramírez got a hero's welcome when he returned from a 50-game suspension for a positive drug test. Less than 24 hours after Ramírez rejoined the L.A. Dodgers, McNair, who played QB in the NFL for 13 years, was found dead next to the body of his 20-year-old girlfriend. As you know, McNair was still married to the mother of his four children (and God forbid that U.S. lawmakers realize allowing a 20-year-old, not much more than a child really, to buy a handgun is a really bad policy it's a bad idea to have a society where a 20-year-old can easily get a gun).

The common thread is how to deal when sports get crowded by stupid reality again. Once and for all, it is time to divest oneself of the notion that sports fans, much less sports writers get to play the ethics and morality squad. We don't.

Honestly, distancing oneself from the scribbling practised by the likes of the L.A. Times' Bill Plaschke and Boston Globe's Dan Shaughnessy, is about the best thing a sports nut can do. It's not clear if they really hate Manny Ramírez, or if it's just a routine, a face-dance. Either way, very little of it is needed.

Life is too short for both hate and for pundits who substitute shtick for trying to honestly convey what an event was like. When did manufactured outrage replace telling the shades-of-grey truth? As a L.A. Times user, reading Plaschke rail about, "Manny did the time, but what about the crime?" is a little like a pivotal scene near the end of The Shawshank Redemption. You know it. Red (the Morgan Freeman character) tells off a parole board official over the meaning of the word "rehabilitated."
"I know what you think it means sonny. To me it's just a made up word. A politician's word so that young fellas like yourself can wear a suit and a tie and have a job."
That is really part of what we're talking about. It's not whether Ramírez's return proves standards have gone all to hell. It's about respecting that ultimately, everyone gets to assert their own terms, not adhere to society's, like Red/Morgan Freeman did with his redemption. This is about getting rid of a sportswriting construct where the columnist fulminates over What Should Be, which has made Bill Plaschke semi-rich.

The hero's welcome Manny got in places such as Albuquerque while playing a few tune-up games in the minor leagues was not reason to go off half-cocked. Americans have always loved outlaws, from Wild Bill Hickok to Barry Switzer. This was not going to change on the say-so of some sportswriters who wanted Manny to do their jobs for them by being all teary and apologetic.

Honestly, Dan Shaughnessy comes off less like a gatekeeper (an outmoded old-media concept) and more like an out-of-touch grouch.
"The longer this goes on, the more it seems that the only people who care about steroids are Hall of Fame voters, a handful of baseball purists, and perhaps those players who have not cheated and now feel like suckers.

"I called the commissioner to ask him about Manny getting the Charles Lindbergh treatment in San Diego (site of his first game back with the Dodgers).

" 'The only comment I have on that score is that fans everywhere will have to make their own value judgment,' said a disgusted Bud Selig. 'That certainly is out of our control. That’s all I'll say on that.' "
Far be it to say there was another way to take Selig's comment that "fans everywhere will have to make their own value judgment." No one who was not privy to the conversation know that the MLB commissioner was really "disgusted."

Perhaps Selig, in the parlance of our time, actually dared to address baseball fans as if they are adults. Maybe those aggrieved Hall of Fame voters, rather than act above the rabble who pay for tickets and the MLB Extra Innings package, ought to heed the people who support the whole pro sports apparatus with their discretionary income. Just because you memorized baseball stats as a kid and that influenced your choice of profession doesn't mean you have superior reasoning skills.

Thankfully, there are a few who can better channel their rage and get a post up about this much sooner, such as ShysterBall. ("What all of these columns seem to boil down to is anger at the fact that there has been no sturm und drang associated with Manny's suspension. The minute baseball actually discovers and penalizes a major star in a drama-free and orderly fashion, however, everyone gets bent out of shape.") There is also Charles Pierce, who wrote a wicked piece for Slate on Monday pointing out that if anything, Ramírez betrays the general attitude toward steroids, exposes the big lie.
"... it was of a piece with Manny's greatest gift as a professional athlete — his innate ability to make everything about baseball that is self-reverentially loathsome look ridiculous. In the great, hushed temple that baseball is perennially building for itself in its own mind, it's Manny's who provides the dribble glasses, the whoopee cushions, and the exploding cigars. It is his holy mission to take the living piss out of the self-important, the moralistic, and the people who cling to baseball in order to defend their inherent right to be 13 years old for the rest of their lives. So, there he was, an Albuquerque Isotope, selling out the ballpark and, by all accounts, happy as a clam.

"... the great steroid hunt is almost solely an intramural problem between baseball and its various acolytes. The overwhelming number of baseball fans — who, given the economic problems of the moment, are filling ballparks in reasonably overwhelming numbers — have quite obviously made peace with what happened in the game over the past 20 years. Manny Ramirez was treated as though he'd pulled a hamstring or tweaked a tendon. Now, he's back. That's the way things are going to be from now on."
No one says you have to like what has gone on in baseball any more than you have to like hearing that McNair was found dead next to a Woman Not His Wife.

This is not an apologia for anyone. There is no hair-splitting about the nature of Ramírez's cheating. Steroid experts say the fertility drug he tested positive for is one that "every steroid dealer carries." It is in the same vein with McNair. Not to speak ill of the dead, but there is little to no defending someone straying outside her/his marriage.

The question is why, as a sports lover, one would assume the best about a NFL player, whom you only know through TV images on Sunday afternoons and the odd Monday night, along with some touchy-feely PSAs for the United Way. It might be best to presume everyone, whatever their many virtues while in the moment doing their thing, is flawed like everyone else. One of the most perceptive comments in that vein came from the Chicago Bears defensive end, Adewale Ogunleye:
"Life is not a game. Football is a game. You can't expect a guy to make pinpoint decisions the way he would as a quarterback. I'm not condoning anything but at the end of the day, he's a human being."
You know this already, but there are other, better options to have as heroes. Point being, people need to let up a little on the knee-jerk judgments. Meantime, and everyone does this in sports (present company included), it's important not to conflate ability with character.

You cannot keep real life from seeping into sports. If anything, sports seeps into real life. The desperate traditional media might be getting high-school catty, but you don't have to play ball. You just have to accept, hey, in this age you have to stickhandle through a lot of weirdness and shamelessness, kind of like the protagonist in Douglas Coupland's JPod.

I am not advocating for everyone to have lower personal standards for her/his conduct. If anything, it's as important as ever to try to set a good example. But if you're going to have people on that we should expect unambiguous virtue from sports figures, you're dead wrong.

Thank you, Manny Ramírez, and thank you, Morgan Freeman.

Monday, April 06, 2009

Easing into a Carolina Blue Monday (or, Roy, that was boring)

Never try to out-contrary a contrarian. Charles Pierce, though, might be missing something essential about sports fan in a piece of punchy snark about a kind of humdrum NCAA tournament.

Sports fans, at the end of the day, don't really mind if a "charmless oligarchy" such as North Carolina or Kansas in 2008 is cutting down the nets on a Monday night in April, although an exciting game is nice too. Carolina, with Tyler Hansbrough, Ty Lawson, et al., just had way too much for Michigan State.

"Charmless oligarchy," though, sounds like one of those jaded-journo phrases. For the rest of us, you have make your peace with the big-ticket teams, Carolina, Kansas, Florida twice, Carolina again and UConn winning championships.

It was an anticlimactic NCAAs, although one might be loath to say that out loud (gotta justify the time outlay). You could argue that aside from 2008, the Kansas overtime win over Memphis (and it's as much remembered for how Memphis spit the bit), this decade has fallen short of delivering a great championship game that wasn't forgotten by everyone except the fans of the two teams playings. Forget the 1980s (Michael Jordan's jumper to beat Georgetown in '82, Lorenzo Charles' dunk at the buzzer to put N.C. State over Houston, Villanova shooting 78.6% to upset G-town in '85, Indiana's Keith Smart hitting the jumper to beat Syracuse in '87). The 1990s had about four classic finals (UConn over Duke in '99, Miles Simon and Mike Bibby leading Arizona's overtime upset of defending champion Kentucky in '97, the Chris Webber game in 1993, and the lost classic, Arkansas over Duke in '94). This decade topped out at one, maybe two.

That said, Pierce has a point about the malaise of modernity tinging March Madness, while the fact people can ignore the NCAA's sieve-like approach to making sure every program is on the level.
"Its grandiosity has rendered it impossible to contain, and that same grandiosity brings with it a demand for consistency, for an easily defined cast of characters, a rack of brand names consonant with the corporate class that's come to run the thing. We are now back in the tedious dynastic years, except that we now have Tudors, Stuarts, and Plantagenets, and not year after year of the House of Windsor. There are no usurpers any more. Four times the predictability and, yes, four times the boredom."
Maybe so, maybe not. Sports journalists sometimes lose sight of the weird conundrum that fans tend to be creatures of habits. Sports provides the illusion of permanency. The NCAA Tournament is like seeing friends and relatives you don't visit too often; the coaches are like a bunch of great-uncles.

The point is the boredom Pierce is talking about almost filters up from the audience. No one is demanding change or really expecting a Final Four between Gonzaga, North Dakota State, Western Kentucky and Utah. It's almost like it confirms that everyone knows their place; you expect to see Roy Williams, hair a little whiter than it was back in 2005, winning another championship. And that's the end of that chapter.

Related:
The Final Snore; A charmless oligarchy of schools has sucked the excitement out of the NCAA Tournament (Charles Pierce, Slate)
Recruiting Violations and the Integrity of March Madness (Madisionian.net)

Tuesday, December 02, 2008

Snark break ...

Starting today, we try to inject some substance into this feature ... hey, where's everyone going? Substance!

Does everyone realize that the UFC's parent company, Zuffa LLC, is in deep water financially with its casinos? Mixed martial arts is here to stay, God love it, let's hope it's in Ontario soon, but as TheSavageScience points out, it's bound to hurt UFC when Station Casinos (just do a Google News search) is chin-deep in debt. Meantime, fight fans are ticked that MMA axes good fighters for flavours of the month.

Brian Burke travelled out to L.A. to see the Leafs play the Kings last night. The Toronto media would have you believe he flew without a plane.

Seriously, why not just give Burke the reins of the Canadian government in Ottawa while he's at it? Red Kelly played for the Leafs and was a member of Parliament at the same time in the 1960s.

Two words for anyone following the situation with the New York Giants wide receiver Plaxico Burress after his weapons charge: Ray Lewis. This is a Vicking. The Giants' best linebacker, Antonio Pierce, is getting the kid glove treatment for his role in the Darwin Award-worthy discharging of a pistol.

From National Lampoon's Sports Minute (which you can follow on Twitter): "Notre Dame has not yet decided what to do with Charlie Weis. But they did ask him to go party with Plaxico Burress."

The above was worth nothing, but this is worth noting

  • USC Trojans coach Pete Carroll is going to give up one timeout per half so Souther Cal can have wear their red uniforms on Saturday against UCLA, instead of road team white.
  • Atlanta baseball writer David O'Brien believes A.J. Burnett will sign with the Atlanta Braves:
    "... they have a much better shot at landing Burnett than Lowe, and partly because they want a power arm who can dominate opponents to be the guy at the top of a rotation that includes budding stalwart Jair Jurrjens and, well, fill in the blanks.
    O'Brien is a big Warren Zevon fan, so that makes anything he says credible.
  • The first all-blues station in Canada, DAWG FM in Ottawa, is in a pinch. Rob over at Salt Water Music explains how you can help. (Crying the blues over the Senators or Leafs does not count.)

Monday, October 22, 2007

PIERCE-ING INSIGHTS WORTH WAITING FOR

Charles P. Pierce shows why he's one of the best sportswriters around with his take for Slate on the Red Sox comeback in the American League playoffs.

Pierce's article went up around 12:15 Eastern on Monday, meaning he had time and space to ponder, ruminate and double-check his spelling. It just shows the limitations of morning newspapers again. Good journalism takes time. Anyone writing for the dead-tree medium who is on Pierce's level is going to chafe at having to pump out the copy with some tight turnarounds.

Related:
Manny Ramírez, as Himself: How Boston's Amazing Left Fielder Led The Red Sox To Another World Series (Charles P. Pierce, Slate)

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

THE BLANDNESS OF KING JAMES?

Charles P. Pierce, who's on the shortlist for the smartest magazine/web sportswriter in North America, has a piece up at Slate arguing that LeBron James, along with being the new Michael Jordan, has also copied MJ's "template for risk-free stardom, whereby involvement in the unruly hurly-burly of the real world is something that a star is not expected to do."

Not that this is going to make us root for the San Antonio Spurs vs. James' Cleveland Cavaliers in the NBA Finals. Gooning it up vs. Steve Nash is forever.

Related:
Fresh Air (Slate)