Thursday, June 07, 2007

ALLARD: SENATORS WERE ONLY MIGHTY UNTIL BUMPING INTO DUCKS

Jean-Pierre Allard delivers the post-mortem following the Senators' season-ending 6-2 loss to the Ducks in Game 5 of the Stanley Cup final.

If one of Senators GM John Muckler's counterparts ever offers him an even-up trade in which two entire rosters change addresses, he should take it without hesitation.

Even if Columbus or Toronto came calling. Just kidding.

In all my 45 years of watching Stanley Cup finals, never have I seen a finalist like the Ottawa Senators play such horrible hockey that by the bitter end, it could easily be argued that there's not one single untouchable on its roster.

That's right. No one.

The question has to be asked. Not tomorrow, not next week, but right now.

How can a team that walks over three teams in 15 ridiculously easy games suddenly lose to another in five even easier games? Before we give too much credit to Anaheim who is a solid team and far more superior to any Eastern team that Ottawa beat this spring, let's not overlook the fact that the Senators played their worst hockey at the most important time.

As impressive as Ottawa was in the first three rounds, and as reassuring as this long playoff run was for everyone, the bottom line is the Senators, once again, failed to accomplish their objective, which is to win the Stanley Cup. And in so doing, they didn't even compete, looking totally outmatched. It was only the third time in the past nine finals that it was over in five games or less, meaning the Senators are lumped in with the 1998 Capitals and 2002 Hurricanes.
Why?

The coach and players seemingly have no answers, nor does the media that follows the team. I'm not sure management knows what hit them and the fans certainly are at a loss to explain how this bunch of tigers morphed into pussycats against a bunch of Ducks who, in classic irony, dropped the moniker Mighty before the season.

Ottawa simply could not compete for the very same reasons that I've alerted readers: Lack of a genuine No. 1 goalie, four extremely soft defencemen and too many dispy-doodling forwards, including the big line that disappeared in the short series the second the bigger and meaner Anaheim players started hitting them.

(Interlude: CP's report card put it best: "Has anyone seen Jason Spezza?")

Will my accusers finally believe me? Likely not. But it's not like I didn't try and warn everyone when they started getting all excited when Ottawa turned their season around in January.

I also repeatedly wrote that Brian McGrattan was the key to Ottawa winning the Cup this year and while they sure didn't need him in the three easy series, we'll never know if he would have been good for a dirty goal here or there, just like I thought he could have helped last year against Buffalo. At the very least, he could have lit a fire under these guys' fannies.
Interesting that Don Cherry also chimed in with basically the same reasoning just last week, even adding that he could teach him how to play and improve his game.

Last night was all anticlimax. It was over after 20 minutes when the Ducks went ahead 2-0, despite a crazy second period that saw four goals scored, three in the last 4 minutes of the period. Of those last three, the first one, credited to Travis Moen, turned out to be the game-winner and was actually scored by Ottawa when Ray Emery and Chris Phillips combined on a play that will likely go down as the biggest gaffe in playoff history since Steve Smith scored on his own net in 1986, depriving the Oilers of a chance to duplicate the Habs' feat of five straight Cup wins.

The first period had far too many chintzy penalties and far too few shots, with Ottawa managing the paltry total of three in a do-or-die game. The second period was a comedy of errors and sub-standard goaltending. The Senators who showed tremendous character in increasing their shot output by two for a grand total of eight across the first 40 minutes.

By then, I was thinking, give me my money back and all the time I've invested since mid-September. Definitely not my idea of a classic. Next year, I swear I'll do like most Sens' fans with the red sweaters and only start watching in April.

Be red, all right. Be very red indeed.

For that and everything else that the mighty Anaheim Ducks accomplished, I say congratulations on a splendid effort. Ottawa's management, whoever they may be -- are you reading this, Eugene Melnyk? -- will be buying the DVD for their viewing pleasure during those long hours at the cottage, or while duck-hunting at the many marshes and swamps that grace our city.

The one who prematurely staged a celebration before the Cup final, when zilch had been won, and who just got snookered by the eight-ball.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

For God's sake, J.P., come in off the ledge! :-) It is always good to wait a little bit before writing a screed like this. Have a look at this again in a week or so, and see if it makes any sense at all to suggest that there are no untouchables on Ottawa's roster.

Think about it -- the Sens have one of the best cores in the league, a team that is younger than the league average, and they are virtually all under contract and coming back for 07-08. About the only player of significance they will lose is Preissing, and he is a fifth defenceman, easily replaced by Schubert. Emery is due for a raise, but the rise in the cap will help Muckler swing that deal eventually. If you want to talk roster swapping, any team in the league, save Anaheim, would swap rosters with Ottawa in a heartbeat.

When the oddsmakers issue their odds for the Cup in October, the Senators will be top four, guaranteed. And you want to gut the roster? Come on now. This team won three great rounds, and came up short against a terrific team. Yes, they looked frustratingly ordinary in the Cup Final, but keep in mind that this was a Ducks team that chewed through the best of what the West had to offer in impressive fashion.

I'm also convinced this would have been a more competitive series had the Sens not been forced to endure that nine day layoff. That was the killer IMO. This team was rolling, but after a long, gruelling season, I think a lot of Senator players just mentally and physically started to "ramp down" during that break, and never did get their edge back.

There are 28 other teams wishing they had a season as good as the Senators did, and there's plenty of room for optimism for 07-08. I wish it had ended differently, sure, but I'm sure as hell not going to advocate trading rosters with the Blackhawks either.

Anonymous said...

J.P., dude, I feel your pain. It was a pretty terrible performance by the Sens in the final. Watching last night's game was akin to water torture. If I were Jason Spezza, I'd be getting the hell out of Ottawa for the summer (well, if I were Spezza, I'd also have millions of dollars and legions of fans, so I dunno, maybe it isn't so bad being one of the goats of the Final).

First priority for the Sens in the off-season: Sign. A. Number. One. Goalie. I can't stress this enough. Ray Emery looked overmatched as all get out during the final.

Next, sign a Pronger-esque defenceman to anchor the backend.

Finally, go trade Daniel Alfredsson. He's the most overrated player on the Sens and he proved he's not a leader during the Final. The Sens need a leader.

Too bad for the Sens. Congrats to the Ducks.

The Dark Ranger said...

Let's link our sites....

www.thedarkranger.com