tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16538424.post2942583241106088874..comments2024-02-29T23:31:03.341-05:00Comments on Out Of Left Field: Headbangers Unite!sagerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08757652892056684490noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16538424.post-76923564601465189912008-05-30T10:46:00.000-04:002008-05-30T10:46:00.000-04:00Unknowledgeable about sports other than hockey The...Unknowledgeable about sports other than hockey <BR/><BR/>The MSM doesn't help this either. On the radio (Team1200, I'm looking at you) and in the papers (outside of the Toronto market where there are significant soccer and basketball shows on the radio and more columns devoted) there is often there is bigger focus on junior hockey than other sports.<BR/><BR/>The seeds for Canadian qualification are there: a good under-20 World Cup organization (other than our shocking performance), strong following for the big three Canadian club teams and MLS publicity, players playing big minutes in big leagues.<BR/><BR/>I was at a pub last week and spoke with a guy wearing a FC Copenhagen jacket. I asked him if he was a big Atiba Hutchinson fan. He didn't know who he was, nor knew a Canadian (and a good one at that) was even playing for the side he saw on vacation.<BR/><BR/>That needs to change. As does the leadership at the CSA which hasn't created the necessary youth programmes that are so key for international success. The CSA hasn't given us a national coach with a record we can be proud of (still dreading Mitchell) or the technical knowledge to smash the programme throuh the brick wall.<BR/><BR/>We can laugh at the amateur moves of CONCACAF, but the CSA isn't far behind...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16538424.post-63746487729164459692008-05-29T14:28:00.000-04:002008-05-29T14:28:00.000-04:00Canada qualifying for 2010 would be a huge sports ...Canada qualifying for 2010 would be a huge sports story in this country, at least one would hope. If people don't get it, and like Dennis says, they might not, then it's a commentary on how unknowledgeable many Canadians can be about sports sometimes. It's like we flagellate ourselves if we're not No. 1, which is unrealistic for a country of such a small population.sagerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08757652892056684490noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16538424.post-51610771611571769442008-05-29T14:00:00.000-04:002008-05-29T14:00:00.000-04:00Canada didn't just lose to France in '86, though. ...Canada didn't just lose to France in '86, though. They also lost 2-0 to both the U.S.S.R., a mid-power at best at the time in soccer, and to Hungary, who were a lower power like Canada. There is no way to put a pretty spin on losing 2-0 to the Hungarians.<BR/><BR/>I'll buy the notion that Canada has made progress, and the Japan vs. Latvia analogy may well be a very good one. All I am saying is that Canada will have to both qualify, and make a little noise at the World Cup, in order to truly engage the public and mainstream sports media back home. Otherwise, it just looks like more of the same. That may not be fair, as I know how brutally competitive international soccer is, but that is the reality.Dennis Prousehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01117649570711228161noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16538424.post-22005008736162323902008-05-29T13:01:00.000-04:002008-05-29T13:01:00.000-04:00And Dennis...knocking the '86 team for not scoring...And Dennis...knocking the '86 team for not scoring is REALLY harsh. When Canada played France in 1986 it was the equivalent of the Detroit Red Wings playing the Wellington Dukes.Duane Rollinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16512076277116230020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16538424.post-76978965405594136442008-05-29T12:58:00.000-04:002008-05-29T12:58:00.000-04:00Dennis,What is giving hope is Canada's play at the...Dennis,<BR/><BR/>What is giving hope is Canada's play at the Gold Cup, a competitive tournament. They've actually looked uninterested in the last few friendlies. And the difference between the current level of talent and the '86 team is considerable (and largely a result of the fall-out from '86). The current team is 100X better, even when you factor in generational improvements. It would have been unthinkable to suggest that Canada would have a player in La Liga in 1986.<BR/><BR/>To make an international hockey comparison Canada in 1986 was Japan--a curiosity. Now, we're Latvia. Still a way's behind the top teams, but capable of pulling an upset from time to time.Duane Rollinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16512076277116230020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16538424.post-70663369399305143172008-05-29T12:40:00.000-04:002008-05-29T12:40:00.000-04:00You mean just like the 1986 World Cup berth change...You mean just like the 1986 World Cup berth changed everything for Canadian soccer? Pardon my cynicism, but I am old enough to remember the last time Canada qualified with what was described then as our best side ever, and then promptly scored ZERO goals at the tournament. Still, the fact that Canada had qualified was supposed to usher in a new era in Canadian soccer. Needless to say, it didn't happen, as evidenced by Canada's cringe-inducing performance in last year's FIFA World Cup U-20 event. <BR/><BR/>Oh, and no one gives a rat's behind how they fare in a "friendly" against anyone. That '86 side teased everyone with good performances in international friendlies also. If the soccer poobahs in Canada want cynical old sports fans like me to sit up and pay attention, then they not only have to get to the World Cup, but have some success when they get there. Otherwise, it is 1986 all over again.Dennis Prousehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01117649570711228161noreply@blogger.com